Table of Contents
Highlights
- Cyber insurance premiums are expected to surge in 2025 due to AI-driven attacks, RaaS, and large-scale supply chain breaches.
- Policies now require stricter cybersecurity measures, such as MFA, zero-trust, and EDR, but exclusions still leave significant coverage gaps.
- AI brings both new threats and defensive tools, yet policy clarity on AI-related risks remains limited.
Introduction: The Ascendant Threat of Cyber Risk
Cyber insurance has, for many years, been known as the last line of defence against the financial repercussions of digital threats. We live in a time when data is king; prolonged data breaches can wreak absolute havoc on an organization, whether that is monetarily, operationally, or reputationally. While this has always been true, 2025 is expected to witness an unprecedented number of complex cyberattacks driven by AI-based phishing, Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), deepfake fraud, and supply chain attacks on critical infrastructure.
The real question is whether the cyber insurance policies of today are evolving fast enough to defend against tomorrow’s threats or handsomely rendering our organizations a sheer false sense of security while we are willingly exposing ourselves to even greater actual exposure.

Cyber Insurance Premiums are Skyrocketing as Threats Become Inflationary
It is estimated that the global cyber insurance market will generate $14 billion in premiums in 2024 and is expected to double by 2027.
This growth is fueled by next-generation threat vectors and the increased cost of incident response and subsequent recovery, including:
- 40% year-on-year increase in Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) attacks;
- Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) linked to state-backed actors targeting critical infrastructure;
- AI-driven exploits enabling privileged access to zero-day exploitation that avoids tümere the exploitation trapped by the defender’s perspective.
- Supply chain incidents that affect thousands of downstream companies at the same time.
Together, these factors are driving premium inflation, altering growth patterns in the cyber insurance sector, while highlighting the trends in ransomware and supply chain cyber threats that insurers everywhere are facing.

The RaaS Revolution: Making Cyber Crime Mass Market
Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) providers, such as RansomHub and FOG, have made the commissioning of advanced ransomware attacks available for a fee or a profit share to non-technical actors.
These providers enable:
- Plug-and-play ransomware.
- Laundering of cryptocurrencies.
- Support documents for the negotiation of payment.
As a result, the volume of ransomware attacks and extortion demands has risen rapidly, and in 2025, the highest ransom paid is expected to exceed $75 million. This rise creates frequency and payout issues for ransomware claims, putting increasing pressure on insurers to adjust the nature of premiums and coverage.
AI: A Double-Edged Sword for Cyber Insurance
Artificial Intelligence is a key enabler of the changing threat landscape, but also a key tool for mitigation, while the insurance industry attempts to adapt.

AI as an Attack Enabler
Attackers are using generative AI to:
- Facilitate hyper-personalized spear-phishing at scale.
- Circumvent multi-factor authentication (MFA), through advanced social engineering and making deep-fake calls.
- Create polymorphic malware, which traditional endpoint detection has historically been unable to catch and kill.
AI for Defensive Capabilities
On the defense, insurers and organizations are using AI for:
- Risk scoring in a dynamic fashion of all of its insured entities.
- Behavioral analytics to detect anomalies even before they happen.
- Checking for compliance with policy conditions in near real-time, monitoring an organization for its compliance with the actual security protocols.
However, coverage complications persist, as insurers have yet to define policy exclusions regarding AI-related risks, such as prompt injection testing or AI errors caused by hallucinations. Thus, insured organizations are left guessing whether an event is compensable.

Stricter Underwriting and Policy Conditions
Due to the increasing number of claims and their severity, insurers have imposed stricter underwriting conditions, forcing insured organizations to remediate gaps in their security posture before they can obtain insurance coverage.
For instance, modern cyber insurance policies issued in 2025 now require:
- MFA implementation for all systems and critical workflows.
- The adoption of zero-trust architectures.
- Verbal and documented incident response plans and frequent tabletop exercises.
- Proof of implementing EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) or MDR (Managed Detection and Response).
For organizations unable to comply when issuing new policies, they will face:
- Higher premiums.
- Even greater exclusions concerning coverage and payout eligibility.
- Total denial of coverage in some high-risk scenarios.

These conditions have the potential to bring organizations moving toward security maturity, but they remind organizations that cyber insurance should complement cybersecurity controls and is not a replacement for those controls, but a compensatory layer of risk transfer.
Exclusions and Policy Gaps
While there continues to be a changing risk environment, exclusions within cyber insurance policies are an ongoing problem. Common exclusions include:
- Attacks by nation-state actors. These attacks are often where the most sophisticated attacks often originate, and where consequences are wide-ranging.
- Fraud enabled by deep-fakes, such as scenarios where an executive is impersonated over video calls in order to authorize a fraudulent transaction.
- Losses associated with hallucinations or misinterpretations created by AI – unless specifically negotiated within the policy.
These exclusions leave organizations unprotected from some of the most sophisticated and most cataclysmic attack scenarios we are experiencing in 2025, reinforcing the importance of policy clarity review before engagement.

Regulation implications: insurance standards
Regulatory regimes around the world are influencing the cyber insurance market by mandating minimum standards of cyber hygiene in all sectors:
- Europe conducts breach notification and resilience with its GDPR and NIS2 directives.
- India implemented Data Protection provisions in India’s Data Protection Act (“DPDP Act”), which has robust data protection mandates.
- The UK Cyber Resilience Bill establishes standards for operators of critical national infrastructure.
Compliance with regulations/the regulations themselves are undeniably becoming more and more tied into policy eligibility, and premium adjustments, leaving organizations to either comply with legal obligations, or insurance obligations.
Cyber insurance for SMEs: Accessibility
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often have access to cyber insurance, but affordability is often an issue. To combat this problem, by 2025 insurers assisted in improving affordability by identifying opportunities to incorporate, or bundle managed detection and response (MDR) services into insurance policies.

Additionally, insurers are offering continuous technology monitoring.Promising Incident Response Retainers as part of coverage to enhance speed of recovery capabilities.
This methodology will allow for SMEs to remain cost-prohibitive, while allowing for enhancement of their cybersecurity posture allowing for lower claim frequencies across the board with insurers.
AI-Related Coverage: The next generation
With the recognition of the burgeoning possibility of AI-related risks, insurers on the forefront like Munich Re’s aiSure™ have developed AI-specific cyber insurance coverages include:
- Liabilities to business operations for model drift and affinity bias in AI systems.
- Liabilities due to AI service outages resulting in loss of business continuity.
- Generative AI-related liabilities associated with misinformation or unwarranted copyright infringement.
These coverages demonstrate the continuing evolution of cyber insurance products tracing the complexities associated with an AI-first world and the alignment of coverages with the operating realities of newly developing situations.

Conclusion: Are insurance policies evolving at the same pace as threats facing organizations?
Sometimes, yes; sometimes, no, but we are nearly at risk.
As we enter into 2025, cyber insurance policies have progressed with multilayered controls, strict risk underwriting, recalibrated premiums, and a more precise alignment with the risks of current threat realities. However, even as insurers work to mitigate risk, threats continually evolve faster than coverage modifications can unearth competition from insurers who are capable of adapting faster than the insurance products, in an even more technologically advanced system augmented by AI, cyber-focused security losses and exclusions, create gaps from standing the ongoing wreckage to reboot.
Organizations must treat cyber insurance as a tool for transferring risk, not as a substitute for maintaining their cybersecurity focus. Risk management in 2025 requires:
- A better cybersecurity baseline that includes a posture to fortify insurance compliance with policy contractual agreements.
- Adaptation, assessment, and continuous monitoring of new or emerging threats.
- Having a grip on where insurance obligations will be driven to protect against.